Board Book Review: I Like Myself!

Book intended to promote self-esteem for all children is highly problematic for children of color – not recommended.

I Like Myself by Karen Beaumont, illustrated by David Catrow.
Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, Boston, Massachusetts, 2004.
Board book, 32 pages.

I Like Myself is the story of an exuberant and imaginative little girl* and her dog.  The girl states in first person narration that she likes herself in a variety of ways and circumstances.

I Like Myself cover resized

Each page spread has at least one sentence and some as many as three.  The text is rhyming, but the rhymes are at times spread over multiple pages.  This book reads like a Seuss imitation, with additional words at the end as padding.  It felt like some of Seuss’ affirming early readers, but with a larger vocabulary and a huge disconnect between the words and the pictures.  The pace was uneven and relied heavily on the pictures to form a cohesive story.  Unfortunately the pictures were even more of a disappointment.

The art was odd.  Not weird in a whimsical, fun way, or a challenging modern style.  Some pictures have incredibly detailed backgrounds while others are mostly unused space.  It is difficult to tell if a character is reoccurring without flipping back and forth repeatedly.  The main character appears to have dreadlocks.  Great!  That’s part of why I bought this.  Except that on some pages the dreadlocks seem normal and on others they look ill-maintained.  And there is this text:

“Even when I look a mess,
I still don’t like me any less,
’cause nothing in this world, you know,
can change what’s deep inside, and so…” p. 18-19

And the picture.  The picture depicts our protagonist in bed, with hair apparently straightened AND in an afro.  I haven’t been able to come up with any positive interpretation of these pages.  At the least, it displays shocking ignorance.  Once your hair is dreadlocked, it does not turn straight again overnight.  None  my family or close friends wear dreads, yet I have managed to learn this very basic fact, while illustrator David Catrow has not.  This is why we need #ownvoices and allies in publishing.

Upon closer examination, one can see foreshadowing of this in the cover image.  The dreadlocks there seem to split into smaller, individual curly strands, which I thought represented smaller dreads clumping together as the protagonist spun.  I assumed this was just the art style, but stand corrected.

I Like Myself p18-19 resized
I Like Myself pages 18 and 19

There are two recurring characters in the book besides the girl* and her dog.  One is a white boy with glasses who appears to be jeering at the girl on page 14 (on page 15 the text appears “And I don’t care in any way/what someone else may think or say”).  The second is a white policeman who appears on page two (where it looks like he has a dog on his head).  These two characters are then seen on page 21, staring at the main character and dog as they ride a Suessian concoction similar to a bicycle down the street.  Why a white police officer and a boy who had formerly mocked her are observing (police officer with whistle in lips and upraised club) is unclear, but they are not applauding.

After this a section begins where the girl states she would still like herself with “fleas or warts” and imagines a variety of mostly animal parts befalling her.  Like most of the book, the illustrations make no sense, either on their own or contextually when read with the text.  Yes, the text describes to some degree what is seen in the illustrations.  But no effort is made to make this understandable.

Another creepy page has text about being wild and tame.  The girl and her dog are shown holding a balloon and laughing wildly at a gigantic lion cowering inside a cage with a tear dripping from his eye. (p. 6 & 7)  Even the non-racially insensitive pages make no sense.  The book has no cohesive style.  Some pages have a richly textured background and others are plain.

I Like Myself p6-7 resized
I Like Myself pages 6 and 7

The true test is to leave it out, let the children interact with it, and see what they say.  They did not like this book.  My pre-reader was confused and quizzed the readers – what’s wrong with this book?  He couldn’t figure out the narrative without the words and was disturbed by the sudden changes at the end of the book.

N particularly didn’t like the way the character “kept changing, what’s wrong”.  The message of self acceptance didn’t get through to these normally savvy kids – I doubt a board book audience will take away a message of loving oneself no matter what.  N lingered over the page with straightened hair, but didn’t comment.

About Board Books

Lots of people think that writing (and illustrating) children’s books would be easy – they are wrong.  Children’s books have many specific types, and while it is possible to write a book that appeals to different groups, it’s less common than you’d think.  Board books and early readers are some of the most difficult children’s books to write well, hence Dr. Seuss’ deserved fame.

A board book serves a dual purpose.  The first use of a board book is for the child to interact with the book.  Most children will be interacting independently with a board book, whether that complements an adult read-aloud or not.  The book’s illustrations should tell a complete visual story that will engage a child whether flipping through the book or looking at a two-page spread.  Secondly, it will be used for story time with a parent and child, so there need to be words to read aloud and a simple story understandable to a young child which ideally adds another dimension.

This is very difficult.  Most board books tend to fall under either beloved classics parents don’t remind repeating ad nauseum (such as The Snowy Day) or short engaging works based on baby’s experiences of the world (such as Snow).  Although there are board books featuring black characters, I’ve been having difficulty finding current board books authored by people of color – many are out of print.**


Do I recommend this book?  No.  The kids disliked it, Baby wasn’t engaged, and I had trouble mustering up the enthusiasm to examine it carefully for review.  I like that Target has more non-white characters on their children’s shelves – hopefully in the future we’ll see more quality books featuring black characters actually written by people of color.  Sadly the diverse board book market is too sparse for me to overlook any title until we can add other diverse board books to our growing collection.  This will stay on our shelves for now.**


*I have identified this child as a girl for review since the character is wearing purple tights and a barberpole striped dress.  However, nothing is particularly feminine about the drawing and no cues in the text or the rest of the illustrations identify the character’s gender.  This book could be used with students who identify with a boy wearing a dress, although there are better options.

**I originally wrote this post in late January/early February when we got this book (pictures took a while).  Since then I’ve bought approximately 15 board books and  was able to identify some #ownvoices board books although sadly, many are out of print.

Author: colorfulbookreviews

I work in a library by day and parent the rest of the time. I am passionate about good books representing the full spectrum of human diversity for every age group and reading level. This blog is my attempt to help parents, educators, and librarians find the best children's books authored by or featuring characters of color.

9 thoughts on “Board Book Review: I Like Myself!”

  1. The same illustrator recently published a book called “When God Made You”. I was very apprehensive but after looking at it in the store, it is not objectionable like this one was. We probably won’t be buying it, but I would be willing to check that one out of the library or read it to the kids. That one has a different author, Matthew Paul Turner, which probably helps (the words are not offensive).


    1. This book was great. I am a white woman, and yes I cannot relate to the child’s hair, but that never crossed my mind. If you are a person of color, and read this book, does it really matter about the hair? Would it make the story any different? The girl in the story is so endearing who cares about hair. The message is to love yourself, Get over it.


      1. Hi Debbra. I have struggled a bit with how best to answer your question. While perhaps the intended message is meant to be positive, the overall effect is entirely the opposite. And hair is not the only issue with this book. But let us start there, because it is a fairly clear point. There were many ways David Catrow could have chosen to illustrate the line “Even when I look a mess,/ I still don’t like me any less”. He chose to depict a young person of color with an afro. I sincerely hope that he did not do so out of a specific desire to thwart the message of the text, but that is still the effect. There is a long, long history in America and many other places of white people policing black hair, perpetuating stereotypes about traditional hairstyles, and depicting black hairstyles in a racist manner. The struggle continues to the present day. Here is an article from the UK that responds to the recent California law. That this book is being given to infants truly disturbs me.

        Beyond the hair, there are several other issues. The white police officer with a club. The disturbing comparisons to animals which might seem innocent and fun but invoke the legacy of dehumanizing people of color. Imagery like pages 6 and 7 posted above, which put the child of color behind bars from the reader’s point of view. And finally, irregardless of race, it is simply my opinion as an educator, librarian, and mother that this particular board book is not well written or illustrated.

        On that final point we can agree to disagree. As for the others, I sincerely hope that you will take some time to reflect, educate yourself, and reconsider promoting this book to any young people in your life.


      2. I am a person of color and am not offended by this book what so ever. I appreciate the sensitivity of the author of this article, but personally I don’t find anything wrong what so ever with the way the illustrator depicted the protagonists’ “messy” hair. I think he made it look extremely messy just to convey to CHILDREN that her hair is messy in comparison to her hair in other pictures. I feel like this review is a complete overreaction; it’s not that deep.


        1. Hi Cindy, thanks for sharing your views. While my review focused mostly on how Catrow chose to depict hair, he also relied on negative stereotypes at several other points too. I find these probably-well-intentioned books problematic when they are aimed at very young children precisely because they appear outwardly diverse. It’s much harder to counteract subtle racism when it has a veneer of inclusion or empowerment.

          But most reviewers felt very differently about this book than I did, so you certainly aren’t alone in your opinion! If you are looking for more board books, we’ve now got more than 50 which you can find on this page.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: